The Alchemy of Happiness 15 May, 2007
Posted by nousha in Books, Philosophy.add a comment
I won’t go into deep philosophical thoughts, 3ashan mabafhamsh awy fiha, but I found interesting parts that makes sense to me, way better than those self help books that fill whole rows on Virgin Mega Store.
Knowledge of self is the key to the knowledge of God, according to the saying: “He who knows himself knows God,”[1] [1. Traditional saying of Muhammad.] and, as it is Written in the Koran, “We will show them Our signs in the world and in themselves, that the truth may be manifest to them.” Now nothing is nearer to thee than thyself, and if thou knowest not thyself how canst thou know anything else? If thou sayest “I know myself,” meaning thy outward shape, body, face, limbs, and so forth, such knowledge can never be a key to the knowledge of God. Nor, if thy knowledge as to that which is within only extends so far, that when thou art hungry thou eatest, and when thou art angry thou attackest some one, wilt thou progress any further in this path, for the beasts are thy partners in this? But real self-knowledge consists in knowing the following things: What art thou in thyself, and from whence hast thou come? Whither art thou going, and for what purpose hast thou come to tarry here awhile, and in what does thy real happiness and misery consist? (…)
For the carrying on of this spiritual warfare by which the knowledge of oneself and of God is to be obtained, the body may be figured as a kingdom, the soul as its king, and the different senses and faculties as constituting an army. Reason may be called the vizier, or prime minister, passion the revenue-collector, and anger the police-officer. Under the guise of collecting revenue, passion is continually prone to plunder on its own account, while resentment is always inclined to harshness and extreme severity. Both of these, the revenue-collector and the police-officer, have to be kept in due subordination to the king, but not killed or expelled, as they have their own proper functions to fulfil. But if passion and resentment master reason, the ruin of the soul infallibly ensues. (…)
Any one who will look into the matter will see that happiness is necessarily linked with the knowledge of God. Each faculty of ours delights in that for which it was created: lust delights in accomplishing desire, anger in taking vengeance, the eye in seeing beautiful objects, and the ear in hearing harmonious sounds. The highest function of the soul of man is the perception of truth; in this accordingly it finds its special delight.
Oh I forgot to mention the source that aroused my curiosity about El Ghazali, it was a mail from one of the rarest girls who actually think (thanks Amani
), she sent a very interesting mail:
Religious knowledge seem to have become of no use than for authorities to issue fatwas (verdicts), for someone to argue for self-centered desires, or to preach in rhymed verses with the aim of enchanting masses” (1). The Muslim world is torn apart between a theological, political, cultural, and geographic conflict between Sunni and Shi’i states(2). Even within sects, some theologians would “dismiss common people as unbelievers and claim that whoever does not know theology in the form they recognize … is an unbeliever” (3). Intellectuals free themselves from the bond of the Holy Law that applies to common people, claiming that the soul of a philosopher is superior to that of an ordinary man, or even that of the prophet, by virtue of greater understanding (4). Masses of ordinary Muslims carry out religious rituals mechanically and soullessly as advocated by the intellectual/theological elite. Political assassinations are becoming more frequent each day(5). And finally armies are being assembled in a foreign land aiming for attack (6)… The year is 488 Hijri/ 1095 A.D.
- (1) Al Ghazali’s, The Revival of Religious Sciences (إحياء علوم الدين)
- (2) Abbasid Sunni State in Baghdad and Fatimid Shi’i State in Cairo
- (3) Al Ghazali’s, The Restraining of Commoners from the Science of Theology (إلجام العوام عن علم الكلام)
- (4) Al Ghazali’s, The Deliverance from Error (المتقذ من الضلال) criticizing sayings of Farabi and Ibn Sina. Some of the passages that Al Ghazali would probably have found offensive may be found in A.J. Arberry, Avicenna on Theology.
- (5) Hassan-e-Sabbah’s fanatical followers known for political assassinations
- (6) First Crusade (1096-1099)
Philosophers in my soup 5 April, 2007
Posted by nousha in Books, Philosophy.2 comments
عندما يجتمع سقراط و أفلاطون و فيثاغورس و سارتر و نيتشة و شوبنهاور و سواهم في مكان واحد, فلابد أن النتيجة تستحق المتابعة… و لكن -كما أنذرتك مرارا- هذا الكتاب لا يناسب ذوي ضغط الدم المرتفع, و لا مرضى المرارة, و لا الذين لا يعنيهم فهم الحياة بل الحياة نفسها! ء
I am an old reader of rewayat alameya lel geib (fantasia, ma wara el tabi3a, safari, ragol el mosta7il, malaf el mostakbal,,,, etc). One of my favorites is fantasia, in brief it talks about a girl called Abir, she is not very pretty, comes from a poor family and is a bookworm, she just loves reading. One day she has the opporunity to live the stories she read through a software called DG (Dream Generator). In one of the stories she is exposed to many philosophical schools and she is supposed to come out with her own philosophy. Very interesting.
Check out some of the comments on the story:
كنت أعتقد من البداية انها ستروق لي رغم التحذيرات المكتوبة والتحذيرات عن منعها عن مرضى ضغط الدم المرتفع والمرارة. أنا لست من المهتمين بالفلسفة ويمكنني أن اقول في حياء أنى لم اقرأ كتاب عن الفلسفة طوال حياتي ولم أفكر في قرائته فلست من محبي التفكير في كينونة البرتقالة بل أفضل أكلها مباشرة نظرا لطبيعتي العملية….
في نهاية القصة اعتقد انني شاركت عبير الشعور بالصداع كنت اكره حصة الفلسفة بشدة عندما كنت في الصف الاول الثانوي لا ادري كنت دوما اصاب بالنعاس هناك افكار تستحق التامل والتفكير لكن هناك افكار اخرى تصيب المرء بالنعاس والرغبة في قتل مبتكر المبدأ الفلسفي اتساءل ان كان واضعوها يعلمون بمدى التعذيب الذي يلحقونه بالطلبة لفهم افكارهم الغريبة……
You can download it from here.
I am thirsty 16 January, 2007
Posted by nousha in History, Philosophy.13 comments
I will try to do something I wanted to do for a very long time (this was one of my resolutions for 2007
). I will try to make real research on the main concepts/philosophies/history of ancient civilizations. I want to have some analytical view on this huge topic. I know it won’t be easy, but I will try my best. I also know that it will be boring to post on the blog, so I decided to dedicate a page for each topic I would want to discuss.
I didn’t decide yet the scope of this journey, I just have many many questions about different historical issues that I want to settle, and I hate it when I forget the questions I was eager to find their answers.
I want to know more about Ancient Egypt, Ancient India (Buddha), Tibet, The Chinese Wisdom (Confucius), Ancient Greeks (Socrates, Plato, Aristotle,,,) , Roman Empire, Aztecs, Inca, Maya, Ancient Persia,,,
I don’t know what will I reach or how or when, but I wanted to share my questions and the results on the blog. I don’t want to make an offline research and post the final outcome here, no, I would like to go through this experience here step by step, and amend it till I reach something valuable.
Mawlawi complex 18 December, 2006
Posted by nousha in Cairo, Culture, History, Philosophy.add a comment
For the past few months, the Mawlawi complex was on top of the list of places I really wanted to visit, but didn’t have the time (or the knowledge) to do it. At last I saw this place with PTP (many thanks to Camel and Timur).
There are some interesting articles on this place, from Touregypt.net, Historical and Architectural aspects of the Cairo Mawlawiya by Giuseppe anfoni (very recommended), I couldn’t find Mai Ziadeh’s article
so if anyone found it plz plz plz share it.
Here is a part I was interested in (copied from the “Historical and Architectural aspects of the Cairo Mawlawiya “):
(p.10) The Cairo sama`khana is one of the last ones built during the ample historic period of the Mawlawi confraternity and the interior space and design are intimately linked with the cosmological symbology represented by the sama` dance. As in other rare examples from this later period, the area assigned to the sama` function is circular. The circle according to the cosmological doctrines of the Islamic philosophers is the expressive synthesis of the cosmos. Over the time the sama` dance has also been defined as a mystic-symbolical interpretation of the movements of the cosmos, according to the speculative elaboration of Mustafa Ya`qub dede and Mehmed Celebi al-Isma`il Rusuhi.
to give you a feeling for what this guy is talking about, here is the design of the sama`khana (also copied from the same article)
I am very fascinated by the Islamic cosmological philosophy (I don’t know if this is how they call it !) It is amazing how the muslim philosophers joined philosophy and geometrical and cosmic sciences to demonstrate their theories.
I really enjoyed this visit, I love PTP for this type of outtings
Salam,
The 3 Gunas 25 November, 2006
Posted by nousha in Philosophy, Uncategorized.add a comment
In the Know Yourself course at Serafis, Dr. Juan mentioned the 3 Gunas:
- Rajas:: which correspond to positive or Yang
- Satwa: neutral, Tao
- Tamas: negative or yin
Here is an entry from wikipedia:
In Samkhya philosophy a Guna is one of three “tendencies”: tamas, sattva, and rajas. These categories have become a common means of categorizing behavior and natural phenomena in Hindu philosophy, and also in Ayurvedic medicine, as a system to assess conditions and diets. Guna is the tendency of the mind and not the state. For instance, Sattva guna is that force which tends to bring the mind to purity but is not purity itself. Similarly Rajas is that force which tends to bring the mind to perform some action but is not action itself.
- Sattva (originally “being, existence, entity”) has been translated to mean balance, order, or purity. This typically implies that a person with more of Sattva has a positive or even orderly state of mind. Such a person is psychologically kind, calm, alert and thoughtful. Compare also the bodhisattvas in Buddhism. Indologist Georg Feuerstein translates sattva as “lucidity“.
- Rajas (originally “atmosphere, air, firmament”) leads one to activity. This type of activity is explained by the term Yogakshem. Yogakshem is composed of two words: Yoga and Kshem. Yoga in the present context is acquiring something that one does not have. Kshem means losing something that one already has. Rajas is the force that creates desires for acquiring new things and fears for losing something that one has. These desires and fears lead one to activity. (Rajas is etymologically unrelated to the word raja.) Feuerstein translates rajas as “dynamism“.
- Tamas (originally “darkness”, “obscurity”) has been translated to mean “too inactive”, negative, lethargic, dull, or slow. Usually it is associated with darkness, delusion, or ignorance. A tamas quality also can imply that a person has a self-destructive or entropic state of mind. That person is constantly pursuing destructive activities. Feuerstein translates tamas as “inertia“.
Sattva-guëa encompasses a steady state of maintenance, and gives rise to knowledge, happiness and virtue. Rajo-guëa is responsible for creation and action. It corresponds to hankering for that which is not, and ultimately leads to suffering and pain. Tamo-guëa is the agency of decay. It obstructs action and causes apathy and confusion.
The three guëas are never separate. They constantly intermingle with one another and compete for supremacy. What’s the use of understanding the 3 gunas?
When one learns any discipline, science or philosophy what one receives is a categorical scheme, a paradigm, by which one looks at the world and understands things. There are many ways of looking at the world, and the way one chooses depends on one’s purposes.
The concept of the three guëas is a categorical scheme given for the business of understanding the universe so that one can transcend it (the ultimate objective of Yoga). That is the assigned task for a spiritual practitioner. For the purposes of modern scientists the three-guëa scheme may not be useful categories, but to a practitioner of Yoga they constitute the theoretical basis of his entire enterprise.
One who knows that the three guëas—sattva, rajas and tamas—are not constituents of the soul but of material nature, and who knows that the pure soul is simply an observer of the actions and reactions of these guëas , is not bound by them.
Isn’t this similar to what Stephen Covey said? That 10% of life is made up of what happens to you. 90% of life is decided by how you react. It is as if the two speak the same language but with different vocabulary…

